“Joseph Plazo on the Dangers of Algorithmic Obedience: Who Controls the Machine?”

Inside the Asian Institute of Management, Joseph Plazo—founder of the algorithmic trading firm Plazo Sullivan Roche—broke the rhythm of praise for AI with a moment of reckoning.

From Manila, where financial optimism runs high — He didn’t celebrate victory margins or machine performance.

“The machine may be faster. But are we still the ones deciding what matters?”

???? **Joseph Plazo: A Technologist Sounding the Alarm**

Plazo is not new to this space. His firm’s AI systems have posted a 99% win rate across key timeframes and are in use by institutional clients across Europe and Asia.

Yet even with these results, he insists—performance isn’t the only metric.

“AI can optimise a mistake to perfection if no one stops it.”

He shared a case from the early days of the pandemic. One of his firm’s bots flagged a short on gold just before the U.S. Federal Reserve issued an emergency policy shift.

“We overrode it. The algorithm was correct—but profoundly unaware.”

???? **When Pausing Is a Form of Leadership**

Traders are trained to move quickly—too quickly.

“Friction is not failure,” Plazo told the audience. “It is the space where judgment lives.”

Plazo introduced a framework he calls **“Conviction Calculus”**—three questions that must be asked before executing an AI recommendation:

- Are we outsourcing our ethics to an equation?
- Are we listening to voices that can’t be graphed?
- Can we stand by this choice if it goes wrong—publicly, transparently?

???? **The Bigger Picture: Asia’s Tech Acceleration and the Governance Gap**

Across Asia, nations are investing heavily in fintech and AI-driven innovation. From more info Singapore to South Korea, the push toward automation is framed as economic strategy.

But Plazo’s question cuts deeper: “We’re scaling faster than we’re thinking.”

He warned of systems designed to win—but not to pause.

“These weren’t errors of greed or emotion. They were perfectly logical moves—executed without context.”

???? **A New Path: Machines That Listen as Well as Compute**

Plazo is not anti-AI. He’s pro-responsibility.

His firm is developing what he calls **“narrative-integrated AI”**—models that factor in geopolitics, tone, and social context alongside market data.

“Machines that don’t just predict, but understand.”

At a private dinner after the event, multiple venture capital leaders discussed collaborations.

One investor called Plazo’s talk:

“A blueprint for ethical AI in an unequal world.”

???? **What Happens When No One Says ‘Stop’**

Plazo ended with a thought that may echo across boardrooms:

“We won’t be victims of chaos—but of unchecked confidence.”

Not a warning against AI—but a demand for wisdom to go with it.

Because when machines take over the trades, conscience cannot be coded out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *